Supporting materials
Download
Download this article as a PDF
Do you drink tea with honey? We are often told to let it cool first, but when is the best time to add the honey to tea?
This activity is flexible and can be adapted to different laboratory settings. Simplified and advanced options are provided, so teachers can select the most suitable methods for their available equipment and students’ experience.
Honey is a natural substance produced mainly by honeybees (Apis mellifera) from flower nectar.[1] Its antimicrobial activity results from several mechanisms, including its high sugar concentration, acidity, hydrogen peroxide, phenolic compounds and other bioactive substances. The high sugar concentration creates a hypertonic environment that draws water out of bacterial cells and can inhibit their growth through osmotic stress.
However, osmotic effects alone do not fully explain honey’s antibacterial activity, as artificial honey solutions containing similar concentrations of mono- and disaccharides often show little or no antibacterial activity against many bacteria. Glucose oxidase, an enzyme naturally present in honey, is largely inactive in undiluted honey because of its low water availability and acidic conditions. When honey is diluted with water, the enzyme becomes active and acts on glucose, leading to the formation of hydrogen peroxide, which provides an additional antibacterial mechanism.[1]
These antimicrobial properties can vary between honey types,[2] and heat treatment may reduce antibacterial activity.[3] This raises a familiar everyday question: how long should tea be allowed to cool before honey is added? In these activities, students first compare the antibacterial activity of different types of honey using the agar well-diffusion method. They then investigate how heating temperature affects honey’s antibacterial activity and measure the cooling of hot water using an Arduino and temperature sensor or thermometer.
The activities are suitable for students aged 14–19 and link microbiology, chemistry, experimental design, measurements and data analysis.

In this activity, students compare the antimicrobial activity of several types of honey using the agar well-diffusion method. They measure the inhibition zones and determine which honey shows the strongest effect. An artificial honey analogue (e.g. a sugar solution containing the same amount of sugar as the tested honey) is included as an osmotic control to help distinguish the effect of high sugar concentration from other antimicrobial mechanisms of natural honey.

The practical work takes approximately 40–50 minutes, followed by about 24 hours of incubation at 37°C or longer at room temperature. A further 20–30 minutes is needed to measure and compare the results.
For each group:
Preparations by the teacher before the class:
Before the lesson, prepare sterile LB agar plates and sterilise all reusable tools and containers. Also prepare a fresh liquid culture of a non-pathogenic teaching strain. Instruction sheets can be found in the supplementary materials (Preparation of liquid nutrient media, nutrient agar and agar plates and Preparation of a fresh bacterial liquid culture).
Agar diffusion assay:


Ask students to compare the inhibition zones produced by the natural honey samples, the artificial honey analogue and the sterile water control. The artificial honey analogue helps assess how much of the observed inhibition may be explained by high sugar concentration and osmotic effects alone.
Suggested questions:
For Activity 2, students should select the honey samples that produced clear and measurable inhibition zones. If several types of honey were antimicrobial active, teachers may choose to continue with just one type to keep the investigation manageable. Alternatively, if sufficient time, materials and Petri dishes available, they could compare two or more types.
Some of the compounds that give honey its antimicrobial properties, such as enzymes and phenolic compounds, are sensitive to heat. Heating can reduce enzyme activity, including that of glucose oxidase, and may also alter heat-sensitive phenolic compounds. As a result, hydrogen peroxide production and other antimicrobial effects may decrease as the temperature of the heating increases.[3] In this activity, students heat the samples selected in Activity 1 to different temperatures and compare their antimicrobial activity using the agar well-diffusion method. They measure the inhibition zones to determine the temperature at which the effect begins to decrease.
The practical work takes approximately 50–60 minutes, followed by about 24 hours of incubation at 37°C or longer at room temperature. A further 20–30 minutes is needed to measure and compare the results.
For each group:

Ask students to compare how the inhibition zones changed as the heating temperature increased. A smaller inhibition zone suggests that heating reduced the antimicrobial activity of the honey.
Suggested questions:
After this activity, students should be able to identify a suitable target temperature for adding honey. However, this does not yet show when freshly prepared tea reaches that temperature. Activity 3 investigates how long hot water takes to cool to the selected temperature.
In this activity, students record the temperature of hot water as it cools and determine the time needed to reach the target temperature selected in Activity 2. Measurements can be taken using a standard thermometer or, as an advanced option, an Arduino with a digital temperature sensor.
The activity takes approximately 20–30 minutes, depending on the starting temperature, cup, water volume and room conditions. A further 15–20 minutes is needed to present and compare the data.
For each group
If an Arduino is available, temperature changes can be recorded automatically using an Arduino Uno and a DS18B20 temperature sensor. Full equipment, wiring, code and measurement instructions are provided in the supporting material (Measuring temperature with Arduino).
Extension: Students can repeat the activity using cups made from different materials or cups of different sizes and compare the cooling times. Based on the results, they can prepare separate recommendations for adding honey to each type of cup.
Ask students to compare the cooling times obtained in each trial and consider which factors may have affected the results.
Suggested questions:
Students can also present the results as a graph, plotting temperature (°C) against time (min). If different cups are tested, the cooling curves can be shown on the same graph for comparison.
Across the three activities, students identify which honey samples show antimicrobial activity, investigate how heating affects that activity, and determine how long hot water takes to cool to a suitable temperature for maintaining the antimicrobial activity of honey. The results can then be used to make an evidence-based recommendation for when honey should be added to tea.
[1] Hossain ML et al. (2022) A review of commonly used methodologies for assessing the antibacterial activity of honey and honey products. Antibiotics 11: 975. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070975
[2] Mavric E et al. (2008) Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 52: 483–489: 10.1002/mnfr.200700282
[3] Stojković M et al. (2021) Changes in the physicochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of honeydew honey subjected to heat and ultrasound pretreatments. Journal of Food Science and Technology 58: 2555–2566. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04762-2
[4] Preparation of nutrient media for growing microorganism: https://www.scribd.com/document/529433106/206-Lab-Ex-3-media-Preparation
[5] Hossain T J (2024) Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology 14: 97–115. doi: 10.1556/1886.2024.00035
Download this article as a PDF