Harvesting light with the biggest eye on the sky
”Faster, Higher, Stronger – Together”, the Olympic motto, could also apply to telescopes with a slight modification: “Bigger, Deeper, Sharper – Together”
Is our planet, and the life on it, unique? Several projects are being launched and planned to find out.
“Are we a fluke? Did we get really lucky to have this planet here that was perfect for life as-we-know-it to come about? Or are planets like Earth common?” wonders Clark Baker, an astronomer at the University of Cambridge, UK.
He is part of a new international project, lead by Swiss Nobel laureate Didier Queloz, which aims to answer these questions through what he calls the most boring experiment ever. They will have to observe the same stars every night for ten years to get enough data to provide answers.

Such long and seemingly mundane data collection could yield the most amazing discovery: the first planets just like Earth orbiting stars similar to our Sun. These Earth twins would then be studied for evidence of life by looking for molecules linked to life, such as water or oxygen, in their atmospheres. Scientists do this by studying the chemical makeup of a planet’s atmosphere through changes in starlight that passes through it. This could help us determine if there is alien life and how common it is.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) sees the question of whether there is life beyond Earth to be one of the most profound of all time, the answer to which will change us forever.[1] Indeed, discovering life beyond Earth would have a significant effect on science and on human civilization more widely.
How would discovering Earth-like planets affect us?
We have already seen a similar revolution in astronomy after 1995, when the first widely recognised exoplanet was discovered by Didier and his supervisor. That discovery provided concrete evidence to the idea that our universe might be teeming with planets, created a buzz and led to new research focus yielding thousands of new planet discoveries and innumerable insights about the nature of the universe. The excitement over exoplanet research and the possibility of life there has led to developments of new scientific instruments and space missions, and has also played a role in driving public interest and securing political and financial support for research.[5] It has also lead to the involvement of people in citizen science projects, which allow people to take part in research and even make real discoveries, such as Planet Hunters, and in amateur astronomy efforts, such as Exoplanet Watch.[5] And of course, research often leads to unplanned downstream benefits for society when its discoveries are put to use in other fields. For example, some astrophysics technology, such as high-energy optics used for developing mirrors for space-based telescopes, can be repurposed for accurate radiation treatment of tumors in medicine.[6]
The first step in discovering life in space is knowing where to look. Many scientists think that our best bet is to search in solar systems like ours and on planets that are most similar to Earth, because we do know that life exists on at least one such planet: our own. It is a rocky planet situated in a so-called habitable or ‘Goldilocks’ zone around its host star, where the temperature is just right for liquid water to exist on the planet’s surface, which is thought to be crucial for life. Earth has all the ingredients that are thought to be necessary for life to emerge: liquid water, just enough energy coming in from the sun, and an abundance of the right chemicals needed for key biotic molecules, including carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous.[7]

But while astronomers estimate that there are 100 billion stars in our galaxy[8] and have discovered thousands of exoplanets,[9] none of them closely resemble the structure of our solar system with a Sun-like star orbited by rocky and gasous planets at distances we observe here.[10] This is partly due to the composition of the universe: most stars are red dwarfs, which have planets orbiting too close to them to be hospitable to life as we know it.[11] The red dwarfs are smaller and cooler than our Sun, which means planets need to be closer to them to be in a habitable zone, which then puts them in reach of harmful radiation that would likely kill off any life.[11]
Another reason we haven’t found any Earth-like planets yet is partly because of the limitations of our detection technologies, which make it hard to spot the small Earth-like planets at such large distances. Scientists use various techniques to detect exoplanets. The transit method detects the slight dimming of a star’s light when a planet passes between the star and Earth. The radial velocity methods detects the gravitational tug of a planet on its host star.[12] None of the methods are ideal for easily detecting Earth-like planets, which means that for most of the Sun-like stars that are closest to us, we still don’t know if they have any planets. This is about to change, with several missions being launched or planned to start in the next few years that should transform our understanding of exoplanets (see table 1). This is an increasingly important field for educators, with the ESA’s recent teaching resource being a good starting point.[13]

| Name | Planned start year | used | Aim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terra Hunting Experiment[14] | 2026 | Automated spectrograph instrument, called High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher 3, installed on a 2.5-meter diameter telescope on the Roque de Los Muchachos Astrophysical Observatory in Spain | Generating enough data from 50 stars over 10 years to detect the first ever Earth-twin orbiting another Sun-like star in the northern hemisphere |
| Second Earth Spectograph[15] | 2027 | Next-generation extreme-precision radial velocity spectrograph installed at a 2.2-metre diameter telescope on La Silla European Southern Observatory in Chile | Survey 30 of the brightest solar-type stars visible from the southern hemisphere for 5 years in search of temperate terrestrial Earth-mass planets in the habitable zone |
| PLATO (Planetary Transits and Oscillations of stars)[16] | 2027 | A satellite dubbed ‘terrestrial planet hunter’ equipped with 26 specialised cameras | Look for rocky planets around Sun-like stars with conditions similar to Earth as a starting point in search for life there |
| Extremely Large Telescope[17] | 2028 | The world’s largest telescope at 39 metres wide at the European Southern Observatory in Chile | Image rocky planets in the habitable zones of stars to characterise their atmospheres and possibly detect biosignatures of life |
| Habitable Exoplanet Observatory[18] | 2030 | A telescope and several instruments mounted onto a satellite, as well as a separate sun-shade to improve the telescope’s detection abilities | Detect Earth-like exoplanets, characterise their atmospheric content, and search for signatures of habitability, such as water, oxygen or ozone |
| Large Interferometer for Exoplanets (LIFE)[19] | 2030s or beyond | Four telescopes flying in rectangular formation with a specialised nulling interferometer instrument to cancel out noise from the stars to allow detection of signals from the planets | Directly detect dozens of nearby Earth-like exoplanets, characterise their atmospheres and use the data to calculate how common life is in the universe |

Such projects can show us how big discoveries demand a diverse set of competencies, huge amounts of rigorous data often collected by new or improved technological instruments, dedicated planning and financial support, as well as a lot of time. They can be a good starting point for discussing with your students how their image of science and scientists relates to the day-to-day reality of a researcher. Here are a few ideas for questions to start a conversation around this:
“Such projects are important because they allow us to gather the data needed to learn new things about the universe”, says Queloz. The Terra project, which he is leading, highlights a couple of key aspects of science: the need for new technology to make necessary observations, and the importance of a diverse team of people with different skills. He says, that such cutting-edge research is a collaborative endeavour that no single person can do on their own.
“Scientists don’t just think and make claims, but they collect evidence to inform their views. And getting data is tremendously difficult, and it needs the best people, the best innovation, and it needs money”, says Quelz. Without capability to collect the data, science is just nonsense or magic. “It’s not really fact-based”, he says.
These high-tech research projects and diligent data-collection are likely to move the debate over alien life from a sphere of magic into a factual knowledge over the next couple of decades.
Sarah Rugheimer, a research fellow at the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, says that life on another planet is a near certainty, though we have no robust evidence to date. But she, like many others in the field, thinks such research projects could find compelling evidence in the next 5–25 years. If they do, it will be one of the most momentous scientific discoveries of all times.
Mićo Tatalović was visiting the University of Cambridge on a media fellowship funded by EMBO.
[1] Why NASA searches for exoplanets: https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanets/why-we-search/
[2] The idea of abiogenesis: https://www.britannica.com/science/abiogenesis
[3] The Initiative of Interstellar Studies: https://i4is.org/
[4] The Project Hyperion: https://www.projecthyperion.org/
[5] Societal impacts of exoplanet research: https://astrobiology.com/2024/10/impact-of-exoplanet-science-on-society-professional-contributions-citizen-science-engagement-and-public-perception.html
[6] The impact of astronomy on life on Earth: https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/big-questions/how-can-astronomy-improve-life-earth
[7] Habitable factors for life on an exoplanet: https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/eight-ingredients-life-in-space.html
[8] Basics of a star’s life cycle: https://science.nasa.gov/universe/stars/
[9] Exoplanet definition: https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanets/
[10] Challenges and Future of finding Earth-like exoplanets: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/earth-analog-terra-hunting-experiment
[11] Definition of red dwarf: https://www.britannica.com/science/red-dwarf-star
[12] How NASA finds and characterises exoplanets: https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanets/how-we-find-and-characterize/
[13] ESA’s teaching resource on how to detect exoplanets: https://hackanexoplanet.esa.int/exoplanets-in-a-box/
[14] Terra Hunting Experiment: https://www.terrahunting.org/
[15] Second Earth Spectograph: https://www.2es.dk/
[16] PLATO project: https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Plato
[17] Extremely Large Telescope: https://elt.eso.org/
[18] HabEx project: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/habex/
[19] Large Interferometer for Exoplanets project: https://life-space-mission.com/
”Faster, Higher, Stronger – Together”, the Olympic motto, could also apply to telescopes with a slight modification: “Bigger, Deeper, Sharper – Together”
A whole new world: you may have heard of rocky planets, gas giants and ice giants, but what about water worlds? Learn about the discovery of an…
Exoplanets are planets orbiting stars beyond our Sun. Discovering them may answer one of the most asked questions: Are we alone in the universe?